Not just what you are good at, but how you are good at it. Whether you need quiet or buzz, a deadline or room to move, variety or a routine you can settle into. The coach works out both, then matches you to real jobs.
Already have an account? Log in
You talk, the coach listens for strengths and conditions, and you get matched to real jobs. Three steps, no forms.
Tell the coach about things you have actually done. Organising the family calendar counts. No forms, no right answers, about five minutes to get started.
You get a picture of two things: what you are good at, and the conditions you are good in. Every one comes with the evidence behind it, and you can correct anything.
Real jobs, scored on both. You can see why each one fits, and why the ones that did not, did not.
Usually because the job is fine and the conditions are wrong. Most people who feel stuck are not short of ability. They are doing capable work in a setting that costs them far more than it should: open plan when they need quiet, or the same task every day when they need something new, or a vague deadline when a firm one is the thing that gets them moving.
The result feels like a personal failing and almost never is. The same person in the right conditions is unrecognisable.
It is the shape of the work rather than the content of it. How much interruption you can absorb. Whether deadlines push you or freeze you. How long you like to stay on one thing. How much novelty you need to stay interested. How much of your day you want with other people in it. None of these has a right answer, and none of them is a score. They are just facts about you that decide whether a job you can do is a job you can keep.
Every other tool matches on skills. Matching on conditions is the part almost nobody does, and it is usually the part that decides how it goes.
Because job history tells you what someone was allowed to do, not what they do organically, or what they would love doing. Someone who has managed teams for a decade is not necessarily a good manager. Someone who has never held the title might be a natural. Broad Careers matches on the second thing, because that is the one that predicts whether work actually works.
Anyone who has ever been good at their job and still gone home flattened by it. Career changers who feel stuck. Returners whose CV has a gap but whose life does not. School leavers with no history at all. People who are fine where they are and quietly sure they would be better somewhere else. If you have ever wondered what else you could do, that is who it is for.
The human ones: judgment, connection, and craft. AI is taking over the busy work, in every role and every industry, and what is left is the part bots cannot replicate. Broad Careers shows you which human skills will be needed going forward for any role you are curious about, and which of them you already have.
Personality tests put you in a box. Job boards show you jobs, not what you are capable of. The coach asks about real moments from your life, notices what they say about how you work, and shows you why it matched you, so you can correct it rather than just accept it.
The same thinking works on a role. Find out which tasks the job actually needs, which ones are quietly getting in the way, and which demands are real requirements rather than just how it has always been done. Better hires, and more from the people already there.
Chat without an account. Nothing is shared with anyone unless you choose to share it. Your report is yours.